Section 6.7 Examples of Impact of SET on Teaching

The following provide examples of successful/innovative uses of SET systems on teaching:

Kember, Leung, & Kwan (2002): A system where teachers are encouraged to devise their own ways of evaluating their teaching innovations.

Barrie, Ginns, & Prosser (2005): The successful collaboration of formative & summative approaches

Giles, Martin, Bryce, & Hendry (2004): Designed and evaluated an online module in collaboration with students.

Tucker, Jones, & Straker (2008): Developed a flexible unit questionnaire

Activity 6.7

Resources

Kember, D., Leung, D.Y.P. & Kwan, K.P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27:5, 411-425

Barrie , S.C. , Ginns P., and Prosser, M. (2005). Early impact and outcomes of an institutionally aligned, student focused learning perspective on teaching quality assurance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 30, 641-656

Giles, A., Martin, S. C., Bryce, D. & Hendry, G. D. (2004). Students as partners in evaluation: Student and teacher perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 681 - 685.

Tucker, B., Jones, S., & Straker, L. (2008). Online student evaluation improves Course Experience Questionnaire results in a physiotherapy program. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(3), 281-296

Back to 6.6 Continue to Section 7 Back To Section 6

Section 6.7 Examples of Impact of SET on Teaching