Difference between revisions of "Section 4.4.1 Traditional SET Instruments"
(Created page with '__NOTITLE__ __NOTOC__<div class="light-blue-corner">{{Template:Page Header}}</div> Tools (predominantly questionnaires) that have traditionally been used to gather student feedb…') |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<br class="clear"/> | <br class="clear"/> | ||
[[Category: Evaluation]] | [[Category: Evaluation]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- SocialRewarding Extension Automatic Code Insertion (19:29, 12 September 2011) --> | ||
| + | <SocialRewardingRecommend></SocialRewardingRecommend> | ||
| + | <SocialRewardingMostViewedArticles show='true'></SocialRewardingMostViewedArticles> | ||
| + | <!-- End Of Automatic Insertion --> | ||
Revision as of 19:29, 12 September 2011
Section 4.4.1 Traditional SET Instruments
Section 4.4.1 Traditional SET Instruments
Tools (predominantly questionnaires) that have traditionally been used to gather student feedback have similar characteristics. Sproule (2000) lists these as including:
- open- and closed-ended questions about content and teaching effectiveness
- at least one item addresses "overall" effectiveness
- written comments about the content and effectiveness of the lecturer
- assurances of anonymity of responses
- administration at the end of term in the absence of the instructor
- summarisation of scale responses across instructors/departments as evidence of "teaching effectiveness"
- largely ignoring differences related to students (e.g. stage), course (e.g. core/elective), and instructor (e.g. novice/experienced) analysis and reporting of "effectiveness"
| Activity_4.4.1
How does this description match the most recent SET that you conducted? |
<SocialRewardingRecommend></SocialRewardingRecommend>
<SocialRewardingMostViewedArticles show='true'></SocialRewardingMostViewedArticles>
