Difference between revisions of "Section 4.11 Methods"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| − | + | This approach is particularly useful because in addition to generating important information about a programme, it’s ranked in importance by the participants and not post-hoc by the reviewer/review panel. It also provides each participant with an equal voice and has a focus on future remedial action. | |
| − | < | + | |
| − | < | + | <br class="clear"/> |
| − | < | + | |
| + | <span class="back-step-link">[[Section_4.10_Methods_#5:_Focus_Groups|Back to 4.10]]</span> | ||
| + | <span class="next-step-link">[[Section_4.12_Methods_#7:_Non-Student_Feedback|Continue to Section 4.12]]</span> | ||
| + | <span class="back-step-link">[[Section_4:_How_To_Do_SET|Back To Section 4]]</span> | ||
| + | <br class="clear"/> | ||
| + | [[Category: Evaluation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:31, 12 September 2011
Section 4.11 Methods
Section 4.11 Methods
Structured discussions are a form of group interview. They are frequently used in the evaluation of teaching and of courses and usually involve a group of students discussing one or more aspect of their learning experience.
Two the most useful formats for structured discussions are Structured Group Feedback Meetings and Nominal Group Techniques.
_structured_discussion.jpg)
_structured_discussion.jpg)
This approach is particularly useful because in addition to generating important information about a programme, it’s ranked in importance by the participants and not post-hoc by the reviewer/review panel. It also provides each participant with an equal voice and has a focus on future remedial action.
