Difference between revisions of "Section 2.5 Involvement of Students"
(Created page with '__NOTITLE__ __NOTOC__<div class="light-blue-corner">{{Template:Page Header}}</div> As the term suggests, students are an integral part of the evaluation process. However, opinio…') |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<br class="clear"/> | <br class="clear"/> | ||
[[Category: Evaluation]] | [[Category: Evaluation]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- SocialRewarding Extension Automatic Code Insertion (23:08, 11 September 2011) --> | ||
| + | <SocialRewardingRecommend></SocialRewardingRecommend> | ||
| + | <SocialRewardingMostViewedArticles show='true'></SocialRewardingMostViewedArticles> | ||
| + | <!-- End Of Automatic Insertion --> | ||
Revision as of 23:08, 11 September 2011
Section 2.5 Involvement of Students
Section 2.5 Involvement of Students
As the term suggests, students are an integral part of the evaluation process. However, opinion about the validity and use of students’ comments is far from universally accepted and has prompted thousands of studies (Spooren, Mortelmans, & Denekens, 2007).
In general, research suggests that well designed student ratings can be a valuable source of info for evaluating aspects of faculty teaching performance (Marsh, 1984; Calderon, Green, & Reider, 1994), a sentiment supported by many researchers (Alsmadi, 2005; Lemos, Queirós, Teixeira, & Menezes,2010; Felton, Koper, Mitchell, & Stinson, 2008; Moore, & Kuol, 2005; Ramsden 2003).
This section explores various facets of student involvement in evaluation of teaching and touches upon issues expanded in other sections of the website.
Section 2.5.1 Need for Active Engagement
Section 2.5.2 Problems using Student Ratings
Section 2.5.3 Tutor Attitudes to Student Involvement in SET
Section 2.5.4 Student Vs Tutor attitudes to SET
<SocialRewardingRecommend></SocialRewardingRecommend>
<SocialRewardingMostViewedArticles show='true'></SocialRewardingMostViewedArticles>
