Difference between revisions of "Section 2.3.1 Module"
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
{| | {| | ||
|class="light-blue-cell"|'''Activity 2.3.1''' | |class="light-blue-cell"|'''Activity 2.3.1''' | ||
| − | + | {{#userform:revisions}} | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
{{#form:method=post|}} | {{#form:method=post|}} | ||
{{#input:type=hidden|name=userforms}} | {{#input:type=hidden|name=userforms}} | ||
{{#input:type=hidden|name=pagename|value={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} | {{#input:type=hidden|name=pagename|value={{FULLPAGENAMEE}}}} | ||
| − | |||
| + | '''How does this description match the most recent SET that you conducted?''' | ||
{{#input:type=textarea|name=Activity_2.3.1|{{#userform:name=Activity_2.3.1}}}} | {{#input:type=textarea|name=Activity_2.3.1|{{#userform:name=Activity_2.3.1}}}} | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | <h3>Submit your answers</h3><div class="form-box">{{#input:type=submit|class=save-button|value=Save Your Answers}}</div> | ||
| − | |||
{{#formend:}} | {{#formend:}} | ||
| + | |||
Revision as of 18:50, 13 September 2011
Section 2.3.1 Module
Section 2.3.1 Module
Module level evaluations tend to have a much narrower focus, concentrating on the individual lecturer, module content, delivery and resources etc. (see Section 4).
Reece & Walker (2002) suggest that the aims of module evaluation should include:
- Finding appropriateness/achievement of module aims & objectives
- Considering structure, progression, balance & coherence
- Identifying relevance & currency of the syllabus
- Understanding the quality & effectiveness of teaching approach used
- Improving & developing skills in assessment methods & techniques in relation to the objectives & their effectiveness in revealing student achievement
Specific aspects to evaluate at the module level are explored in more detail in Section 4 in the ‘Focus of SET’ and ‘Aspects SET should Cover’ sections.
| Activity 2.3.1 |
Submit your answers
