Difference between revisions of "Section 2.1 Definitions"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
'''Consider the above definitions, any that you may have come across already, and your own experiences of evaluation: what do you feel is the key defining issue for SET, and how has this impacted on your teaching?''' | '''Consider the above definitions, any that you may have come across already, and your own experiences of evaluation: what do you feel is the key defining issue for SET, and how has this impacted on your teaching?''' | ||
{{#input:type=textarea|name=Activity_2.1|{{#userform:name=Activity_2.1}}}} | {{#input:type=textarea|name=Activity_2.1|{{#userform:name=Activity_2.1}}}} | ||
| − | |||
<h3>Submit your answers</h3><div class="form-box">{{#input:type=submit|class=save-button|value=Save Your Answers}}</div> | <h3>Submit your answers</h3><div class="form-box">{{#input:type=submit|class=save-button|value=Save Your Answers}}</div> | ||
{{#formend:}} | {{#formend:}} | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:24, 14 September 2011
Section 2.1 Definitions
Section 2.1 Definitions
As Lemos, Queirós, Teixeira, & Menezes (2010) report, definition in SET is not a straightforward process, with considerable disagreement over how to describe and operationally define quality, the goals and the focus of the evaluation.
| Sample definitions include:
The main purpose of evaluating lectures, or any form of teaching, is to improve them (Brown & Atkins, 1988)
|
| Activity 2.1 |
