Difference between revisions of "Section 2.1 Definitions"
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| − | <span class="back-step-link">[[Section_2:_What_Is_SET?|Back To Section 2]]</span><span class="next-step-link">[[ | + | <span class="back-step-link">[[Section_2:_What_Is_SET?|Back To Section 2]]</span><span class="next-step-link">[[Section_2.2_History_&_Role|Continue to Section 2.2]]</span> |
<br class="clear"/> | <br class="clear"/> | ||
[[Category: Evaluation]] | [[Category: Evaluation]] | ||
Revision as of 19:25, 11 September 2011
Section 2.1 Definitions
Section 2.1 Definitions
As Lemos, Queirós, Teixeira, & Menezes (2010) report, definition in SET is not a straightforward process, with considerable disagreement over how to describe and operationally define quality, the goals and the focus of the evaluation.
| Sample definitions include:
The main purpose of evaluating lectures, or any form of teaching, is to improve them (Brown & Atkins, 1988)
|
| Activity 2.1
Consider the above definitions, any that you may have come across already, and your own experiences of evaluation: what do you feel is the key defining issue for SET, and how has this impacted on your teaching? |
